Save the Scenic Santa Ritas

Fighting to protect the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains from the devastating impacts of mining.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Board of Directors and Staff
    • Endorsements
    • Opposition and Resolutions
    • Volunteers and Friends
  • Background
    • Rosemont Mine
      • History
      • Impacts
        • Air Quality
        • Land Use
        • Wildlife and Habitat
        • Scenic Views
        • Heritage
        • Recreation
        • Economy
        • Water and Hydrology
    • Legislation
    • Copper
    • Patagonia Area Mines
  • News
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Join Mailing List
    • Endorse Us
    • SSSR Presentation
    • Show Your Support
    • Letter Writing
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Visual Media
    • Links
    • Documents and Reports
    • 1872 Mining Law
    • Inspiration
  • Projects
    • Lens on the Land
      • Biodiversity
      • Culture
      • Economy: Industry, Tourism & Recreation
      • The Land
      • Night Sky and Astronomy
      • Water Resources
    • Rosemont Mine Truth

Rosemont Deceptions

April 9, 2013 By Administrator Leave a Comment


Deceptions

Here is a list of some of the deceptions we have heard from Rosemont Copper:

Rosemont Copper’s high-powered PR campaign tells citizens that its open pit mine will be a “state-of-the-art, first class mine” that will employ “21st Century” technologies. The company, however, tells Arizona regulators the mile-wide, half- mile deep mine is just another “typical open pit copper mine.”

Augusta Resource Corp. the Vancouver, B.C. owner of the Rosemont Copper Company, repeatedly states in regulatory filings that it is prepared to immediately begin construction once it receives final permits. However, the company fails to explain how this is possible since the company suspended engineering on the mine in July 2011.

Coronado National Forest Jim Upchurch cast doubt on Rosemont Copper’s truthfulness in regulatory filings when he ordered his staff to review the accuracy of Rosemont’s explanation for its sudden abandonment of the mining plan that was the basis of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Once the comment period was closed on the DEIS, Rosemont released a new mining plan that increased sulfide ore production by 34 percent.

A central pillar of Augusta Resource Corporation’s PR campaign is that the Rosemont Copper project will reduce the nation’s dependence on imported copper. In fact, Augusta has already pledged 50 percent of its copper production to Korean and British partners and states in regulatory filings that it is in negotiations with foreign smelters to purchase the balance.

Rosemont Copper has issued wildly divergent estimates of the company’s impact on jobs in Arizona ranging from 406 to 9,000 jobs. Augusta Resource’s regulatory filings, however, state that Rosemont’s employment will average 448 workers over the life of the mine.

Rosemont executives have repeatedly made statements to the press that the company has no plans to develop three adjacent mining claims to the Rosemont mine site. The claims cross over the ridgeline of the Santa Rita Mountains and onto the range’s western slope. However, the company is telling regulators and investors that one of the claims could be included in the Rosemont Copper project as a “satellite development”.

Augusta Resource Corp. states in regulatory filings that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency only plays an “advisory” role in whether the company receives a Section 404 Clean Water Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Augusta, however, ignores that fact that EPA can veto any 404 permit issued by the Corps.

Rosemont Copper claims it doesn’t have to abide by Pima County’s outdoor lighting ordinance and that it plans to voluntarily reduce lighting impacts below the “intent” of the county’s 2011 code. Pima County, however, made it clear in a September 2012 letter to the Coronado National Forest that the lighting code applies to the Rosemont mine.

source: www.RosemontMineTruth.com

Filed Under: Rosemont Mine

DEIS Comments

January 19, 2012 By Administrator Leave a Comment


Save the Scenic Santa Ritas, et al., Comments submitted to the Forest Service

If you would like to download the “letter” it is available to be downloaded:

Final comment letter submitted by Save the Scenic Santa Ritas, et al. (245 MB)

NOTE: Because of the large file size, this document will take at least several minutes to download, and much longer if you have a dial-up connection. If you have trouble downloading this large file, please contact Lisa Froelich at lisa@scenicsantaritas.org.

Filed Under: Rosemont Mine

Recent Posts

  • Litigation Schedule February 17, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2021 February 15, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2020 December 31, 2020
  • Long Mountain – a film by Leslie Epperson July 8, 2020
  • A major win for endangered species in the Santa Ritas February 13, 2020

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Sign up to receive important updates straight to your inbox! We will guard your privacy and will not provide your email to anyone else.

RSS Latest from Rosemont Mine Truth

  • Pima County reaffirms resolution opposing Rosemont Mine April 19, 2019
  • Hudbay approves $122 million spending plan for “early works” at Rosemont March 29, 2019
  • Hudbay seeking Rosemont Mine joint venture partner after receiving key federal Clean Water Act permit March 15, 2019
  • Hudbay has failed to provide legal justification for Clean Water Act permit, Natural Resources Committee chairman says March 5, 2019

Selected Lens on the Land Photographs

PlayPause
Slider

Litigation Update

Speaking of which (the appeal originally filed in Nov. 2017 challenging the Forest Service’s approval of the mine), we now have a schedule for that case in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – not definitive, but at least a general time frame:

 

After a lot of negotiating, the lawyers have come to an agreement on the final schedule of our cases before the 9th Circuit Appeals Court. Here is the updated schedule:

  • Feds opening brief due by 1 June 2020
  • Hudbay opening brief due by 15 June 2020
  • Then, our response by 3 September 2020
  • Feds optional reply brief by 2 November 2020
  • Hudbay optional reply brief by 9 November 2020

Click here for more updates

DONATE

Copyright © 2021 · Save the Scenic Santa Ritas