Save the Scenic Santa Ritas

Fighting to protect the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains from the devastating impacts of mining.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Board of Directors and Staff
    • Endorsements
    • Opposition and Resolutions
    • Volunteers and Friends
  • Background
    • Rosemont Mine
      • History
      • Impacts
        • Air Quality
        • Land Use
        • Wildlife and Habitat
        • Scenic Views
        • Heritage
        • Recreation
        • Economy
        • Water and Hydrology
    • Legislation
    • Copper
    • Patagonia Area Mines
  • News
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Join Mailing List
    • Endorse Us
    • SSSR Presentation
    • Show Your Support
    • Letter Writing
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Visual Media
    • Links
    • Documents and Reports
    • 1872 Mining Law
    • Inspiration
  • Projects
    • Lens on the Land
      • Biodiversity
      • Culture
      • Economy: Industry, Tourism & Recreation
      • The Land
      • Night Sky and Astronomy
      • Water Resources
    • Rosemont Mine Truth

Scenic Views

Visual Resources

Corresponding page numbers to the DEIS:
Summary of Impacts: pp. 452-511; Environmental Consequences: pp. 479-511

The proposed action would adversely impact visual resources. The proposed action would include strong contrasts and adverse impacts from the highly visible pit face and diversion channel, along with permanent and major impacts, including the irreversible loss of scenic views, from highly visible piles and power lines visible in Box Canyon, along the ridgeline, and at Lopez/Gunsight Pass for the life of the project.

Under the proposed action, the plant facility would be visible for up to 7 years. There would be impacts to 13,742 acres within the Santa Rita Ecosystem Management Area with very high and high scenic integrity characteristics. There would be 40 miles of project area visibility along forest roads and trails with concern levels 1 and 2, as defined under the Scenery Management System, and 3.4 miles of scenic quality impacts along State Route 83. There would be 187,893 acres within the analysis area with project visibility.

Mitigation measures to reduce the impact to visual resources would occur during mine operations, closure, and postclosure. Concurrent reclamation will occur during operations that would have minor beneficial impacts to scenic quality. Sediment and dust controls would reduce but not eliminate visual impacts from fugitive dust. During operations, the colors of buildings would be painted or stained in earth tones to reduce color contrasts with the surrounding landscape. During closure, facilities and foundations would be removed, access roads would be reclaimed, and final reclamation would be conducted on the waste rock and tailings piles. During closure, the applicability of measures to darken the exposed rock faces of the mine pit to reduce color contrasts would also be determined. Postclosure reclamation would include monitoring revegetation success on the waste rock and tailings slopes.

Additional mitigation measures may be considered. The Forest Service is investigating the feasibility of geomorphic design (sometimes called landforming) to create more stable, natural functioning, and natural looking topography related to the waste rock and tailings piles. With respect to the facility footprint, grading to restore a natural appearing topography would reduce impacts and encourage more natural revegetation in this area. Breaking up the horizontal benches in the visible portions of the upper pit may also be pursued. There are several ways to accomplish this, including double benching, postmine bench blasting, and randomized benching.

Recent Posts

  • Litigation Schedule February 17, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2021 February 15, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2020 December 31, 2020
  • Long Mountain – a film by Leslie Epperson July 8, 2020
  • A major win for endangered species in the Santa Ritas February 13, 2020

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Sign up to receive important updates straight to your inbox! We will guard your privacy and will not provide your email to anyone else.

RSS Latest from Rosemont Mine Truth

  • Pima County reaffirms resolution opposing Rosemont Mine April 19, 2019
  • Hudbay approves $122 million spending plan for “early works” at Rosemont March 29, 2019
  • Hudbay seeking Rosemont Mine joint venture partner after receiving key federal Clean Water Act permit March 15, 2019
  • Hudbay has failed to provide legal justification for Clean Water Act permit, Natural Resources Committee chairman says March 5, 2019

Selected Lens on the Land Photographs

PlayPause
Slider

Litigation Update

Speaking of which (the appeal originally filed in Nov. 2017 challenging the Forest Service’s approval of the mine), we now have a schedule for that case in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – not definitive, but at least a general time frame:

 

After a lot of negotiating, the lawyers have come to an agreement on the final schedule of our cases before the 9th Circuit Appeals Court. Here is the updated schedule:

  • Feds opening brief due by 1 June 2020
  • Hudbay opening brief due by 15 June 2020
  • Then, our response by 3 September 2020
  • Feds optional reply brief by 2 November 2020
  • Hudbay optional reply brief by 9 November 2020

Click here for more updates

DONATE

Copyright © 2021 · Save the Scenic Santa Ritas