Save the Scenic Santa Ritas

Fighting to protect the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains from the devastating impacts of mining.

Close×
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Board of Directors and Staff
    • Endorsements
    • Opposition and Resolutions
    • Volunteers and Friends
  • Background
    • Rosemont Mine
      • History
      • Impacts
        • Air Quality
        • Land Use
        • Wildlife and Habitat
        • Scenic Views
        • Heritage
        • Recreation
        • Economy
        • Water and Hydrology
    • Legislation
    • Copper
    • Patagonia Area Mines
  • In the News
  • Action
    • What Can I Do?
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Join Mailing List
    • Endorse Us
    • SSSR Presentation
    • Show Your Support
    • Letter Writing
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Recommended Reading
    • Visual Media
    • Links
    • Documents and Reports
    • 1872 Mining Law
    • Inspiration
  • Projects
    • Lens on the Land
      • Biodiversity
      • Culture
      • Economy: Industry, Tourism & Recreation
      • The Land
      • Night Sky and Astronomy
      • Water Resources
    • Rosemont Mine Truth
  • Newsletter

1872 Mining Law

The Mining Law of 1872 and Reform

Read a fact sheet on S 140, the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Act of 2009

Go to Earthworks Mining Reform page for the latest information.


Many thanks to the Western Mining Action Project for supplying the legal definitions and background information on claim validity and determination used in this article.

What is the Mining Law of 1872?

In 1872 the West already teemed with miners digging the earth, blasting rock and dreaming of fortunes to be made. The Mining Law of 1872 was passed by Congress to legitimize this booming industry and to aid in the settlement of the vast public lands in the West. Prior to passage of the law there were no formal procedures to guarantee the legal “right” to mining claims.

The Mining Law of 1872 gives anyone the right to enter, stake a claim and prospect for minerals on public lands (Forest Service or BLM), no matter what other values may exist there, such as wildlife habitat, recreation, scenic beauty, or water resources. The BLM and other federal agencies regulating “multiple use” public lands often give mining highest priority because of the Mining Law. Unfortunately, once mined, the land is no longer useful for any other purposes. Under the Mining Law there are no provisions for environmental protection and no requirements for reclaiming and restoring the land when the miners are through. Federal environmental laws provide for minimal anti-degradation protection and some states have strong mine reclamation laws, although Arizona’s is not very strong. Arizona’s reclamation act deals primarily with public safety, and only nominally with environmental protection. You can read the Arizona Mined Land Reclamation Act at http://www.asmi.state.az.us/documents/rec.pdf and Rule and Regs at http://www.asmi.state.az.us/UserFiles/PDF/rr&r.pdf. Most other western states have better and stronger reclamation requirements than Arizona’s.

Our public lands are easily accessible to mining interests, including foreign owned companies. To establish a claim on public land, a miner needs to physically place markers at the corners of the 20-acre claim, file an annual assessment affidavit with the BLM and pay the annual claim maintenance fee of $125 ($170 for the first year), or file a fee waiver if they’ve done work on the claim.

Claim validity is a very important consideration at Rosemont Ranch. If the claims are not valid, Augusta most likely won’t be able to proceed with their proposal since this may be the only way they would be able to use the Forest Service lands, which they need for the project. Since Augusta plans to use the mining claims to dump their waste and not for mineral extraction (the ore body is on their private land), the question as to whether the claims are valid may have to be determined in the courts. However, it would seem that if there were valuable minerals under the claims, Augusta would not be proposing to bury them under millions of tons of waste rock. Pima County has recently requested that the Forest Service investigate the validity of Augusta’s claims.

Congresswoman Giffords statement on mineral withdrawal Sep. 29, 2007

How is the validity of a claim determined?

Under the Mining Law, all mining claims must, in order to be valid, be supported by the “discovery” of a valuable mineral deposit ( See 30 U.S.C. §§ 23, 35). The Supreme Court has endorsed at least two tests for determining whether a claim qualifies as a “valuable mineral deposit:

” Under the “marketability” test, it must be shown that the mineral can be “extracted, removed and marketed at a profit.” ( United States v. Coleman , 390 U.S. 599, 600 (1968)). According to the “prudent-person” test, “the discovered deposits must be of such a character that a person of ordinary prudence would be justified in the further expenditure of his labors and means, with a reasonable prospect of success, in developing a valuable mine.” Id . at 602.

The Court has held that profitability is “an important consideration in applying the prudent-man test and the marketability test,” and noted that “… the prudent-man test and the marketability test are not distinct standards, but are complementary in that the latter is a refinement of the former.” Id . at 602-603. Further, the test is objective, is based on the “prudent-man,” and an individual miner’s subjective belief that a deposit is “valuable” is irrelevant, for “[i]t is thus evident that the willingness of a mining claimant, grounded only in hope of success, to expend time and money in further efforts to develop a mine will not suffice.” U.S. v. Nevitt , A-30030 (July 28, 1964).

Upon “discovery” of a “valuable mineral” the miner gains the right to use the property and can extract ore and use the surface for anything associated with mining. Without the “discovery”, the claimant has no rights as against the United States to the public lands. Additionally, even if such rights did exist, they exist only “so long as they comply with the laws of the United States, and with State, territorial, and local regulations….” 30 U.S.C. § 26. A mining claim location does not give the presumption of a discovery. Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda , 248 F.Supp.

Pima County’s letter to the Forest Service regarding validity of claims at Rosemont, Dec. 19, 2006

Have any changes been made to this antiquated law?

In the 134 years since the law was passed, Congress has made only a few changes. The most significant change was to distinguish between the various types of minerals. Leasable minerals (coal, oil, gas) are no longer free; miners must lease the land and pay a royalty on their profits. Saleable minerals (common varieties of gravel, sand, stone) now have to be bought or obtained by permit. However, Locatable minerals, more often called hardrock minerals (copper, gold, lead, uranium, silver and so on) have remained virtually free, with no royalties paid for ores mined on public federal land.

With the high prices of hardrock minerals, a new boom era of mining is happening in the West. With modern technology which can extricate low concentrations of ore from rock, miners will be digging and blasting more earth and rock per ounce of ore retrieved to make their investments profitable. They are under little legal obligation to protect the environment before and during their work, or to reclaim the land after they are through. Aside from surface destruction, mining has the potential for creating vast environmental damage of other types; many Superfund sites are old mines.

Reform of the Mining Law of 1872

Read about current legislation here.

Recent Posts

  • LENS ON THE LAND May 16, 2023
  • 1872 MINING LAW May 16, 2023
  • SENATE BILL FAVORS HUDBAY May 16, 2023
  • HUDBAY LEGACY May 16, 2023
  • “DIRTY MINING TRUMPS ALL OTHER USES” ACT May 8, 2023
  • See Our detailed letter to the Arizona State Land Department April 18, 2023
  • HUDBAY’S NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO ALL OUR BACKYARDS  April 18, 2023
  • Guardians of The Santa Ritas April 18, 2023
  • Pima County Urges Arizona State Land Department To Deny Hudbay’s Request To Purchase 200 Acres For Tailings And Rubble  April 11, 2023
  • Federal Memo May Bolster Hudbay’s Position on Rosemont Mine Site March 16, 2023

Newsletter Sign-Up

You will receive an email asking you to confirm your subscription by clicking on a link. If you don’t see the email right away in your inbox, please check the junk folder.

You will NOT be added UNLESS you confirm your subscription. Thank you!

COPPER MINE TOXINS

In this video Dr. Hart describes how copper mines fail to prevent toxins concentrated in tailing piles and ponds from polluting our air and water. WATCH NOW video by John Grahame

Copper Mines and Aquifers

Dr. Stanley Hart describes the impact of copper mining on underground aquifers, both how much groundwater is used and where it ends up. WATCH NOW video by John Grahame

Why Mine the Santa Ritas? – Dr. Stanley Hart

Dr. Stanley R. Hart, Scientist Emeritus at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, talks with a group from Save the Scenic Santa Ritas about the factors that are causing HudBay Corporation to pursue development of a large open pit mine (“Copper World”) in the Santa Rita Mountains near Sahuarita in southern Arizona. WATCH NOW video by John Grahame

Geology of the Santa Ritas — Dr. Stanley Hart

Dr. Stanley R. Hart talks with a group from Save the Scenic Santa Ritas about the geology of this Sky Island mountain range near Sahuarita in southern Arizona. Dr. Hart is Scientist Emeritus at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. WATCH NOW video by John Grahame

Rosemont/ Copper World Mine Complex News

LENS ON THE LAND

1872 MINING LAW

SENATE BILL FAVORS HUDBAY

HUDBAY LEGACY

“DIRTY MINING TRUMPS ALL OTHER USES” ACT

See Our detailed letter to the Arizona State Land Department

More Posts from this Category

Update on Lake Mead and Lake Powell water levels

Watch the April video update about Lake Mead, new water restrictions in Las Vegas, and news from Lake Powell.
WATCH NOW

Copper World Flyover January 6, 2023 by David Steele

Another shocking sight of the incredible destruction happening on our beautiful Santa Ritas.WATCH VIDEO NOW

Russ McSpadden’s recent fly-over showing mine activity

In Nov 2022 Russ captured recent bulldozing in the Santa Rita Mountains. His video starts over the Rosemont mine project on the east side and then swings over the Copper World project on the west side. WATCH VIDEO NOW

Explore the proposed Rosemont and Copper World projects virtually

Check out Pima County’s updated map of the proposed mine site. Click on any spot on the map for ownership/status information. Mapping details are based on Hudbay’s PEA dated May 1.

Proposed Rosemont/ Copper World Mine Complex

Image compilation of the area

LENS ON THE LAND

Sign the Petition

Please ask Commissioner Arizona State Land Department Ms. Robyn Sahid to deny request by Rosemont Copper Company for the department to sell at auction two noncontiguous parcels of State Trust land totaling 200 acres.

SIGN HERE

Recommended Reading List

Browse HERE over 30 titles of carefully selected books in various categories including: copper, water, mining, wilderness, exploration, and more. Your purchase supports the efforts of the SSSR

January 2023 Powerpoint Presentation

Click here to download (PDF)

Litigation Update

There have been two recent judicial rulings on the Rosemont Copper Company projects — one favorable and one unfavorable.

Click here to learn more

The latest on Hudbay’s Copper World project in the Santa Rita Mountains

Click here to download (PDF)

Where is the Rosemont/Copper World Mine Complex?

Click here for directions

HELP US PROTECT THE SANTA RITAS

Close×

Copyright © 2023 · Save the Scenic Santa Ritas