Save the Scenic Santa Ritas

Fighting to protect the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains from the devastating impacts of mining.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Board of Directors and Staff
    • Endorsements
    • Opposition and Resolutions
    • Volunteers and Friends
  • Background
    • Rosemont Mine
      • History
      • Impacts
        • Air Quality
        • Land Use
        • Wildlife and Habitat
        • Scenic Views
        • Heritage
        • Recreation
        • Economy
        • Water and Hydrology
    • Legislation
    • Copper
    • Patagonia Area Mines
  • News
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Join Mailing List
    • Endorse Us
    • SSSR Presentation
    • Show Your Support
    • Letter Writing
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Visual Media
    • Links
    • Documents and Reports
    • 1872 Mining Law
    • Inspiration
  • Projects
    • Lens on the Land
      • Biodiversity
      • Culture
      • Economy: Industry, Tourism & Recreation
      • The Land
      • Night Sky and Astronomy
      • Water Resources
    • Rosemont Mine Truth

Rosemont Mine enviro-impact statement delayed anew

December 23, 2010 By Administrator Leave a Comment


Rosemont Mine enviro-impact statement delayed anew

Tony Davis Arizona Daily Star Arizona Daily Star | Posted: Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:00 am

The draft environmental impact statement for the proposed Rosemont Mine has been delayed for the fourth time in two years, the U.S. Forest Service announced Wednesday.

This time, formal release of the document is being pushed back into 2011, and Forest Service officials say they don’t know exactly when it will be released.

Rosemont Copper, which would build the mine, hopes to start construction in 2012. But Rosemont officials said they still aren’t concerned that the construction start will be delayed past 2012.

It’s taking longer than expected to produce and review the environmental document than federal officials had expected, said Heidi Schewel, a Forest Service spokeswoman.

Unlike previous delays, which were triggered by new or heightened concerns over matters such as water supplies and a rare orchid, no one issue is causing this delay, Schewel said. A number of issues arose during the review of the document, which required analysis and coordination by the service, working with various specialists and other agencies, Schewel said.

“We’re looking at the big picture. . . . This is a complex process, and as issues arose, we took the time to give them the analysis needed,” Schewel said.

The environmental statement, which will cover 11 detailed issues, is the key document in the service’s long and involved effort to decide on whether the mine should be approved for the Santa Rita Mountains southeast of Tucson.

Construction of the mine can’t start until the service has approved an environmental impact statement and the courts have disposed of any legal challenges to the service’s decision.

The proposed mine would remove 220 million pounds of copper annually over 20 years from private land in the Santa Ritas, then store the waste rock and tailings from the mine on neighboring Forest Service land.

The Forest Service is now reviewing an internal working draft of the environmental statement along with the Bureau of Land Management and the Army Corps of Engineers, the other federal agencies that must make decisions based on what the environmental statement says.

Once those agencies finish, the Forest Service will make the internal draft available to Pima County, the Arizona Game and Fish Department, and other non-federal agencies that are cooperating on the statement’s review.

When they’re done, the document will be publicly released. The public will get 90 days to comment. Six public meetings will be held in Tucson and surrounding areas on the statement.

Originally, the draft statement was to be released in spring 2009.

Roger Featherstone, director of the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, predicted that Rosemont won’t be able to get on line even in five years, because he thinks it will take one to two years to prepare the final environmental statement, which then will probably be followed by lawsuits.

“Those will take a long time to wind their way through the courts,” Featherstone said.

Rosemont Copper CEO Rod Pace, however, said that while the delay could stretch the project’s construction start until later in 2012 than the company had hoped, time still exists for the service to review both draft and final environmental statements and for construction to start by the end of 2012.

Nevertheless, Pace said company officials are disappointed at the delay and wish the service had announced a firm release date.

Contact reporter Tony Davis at tdavis@azstarnet.com or 806-7746.

Filed Under: Rosemont

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Litigation Schedule February 17, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2021 February 15, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2020 December 31, 2020
  • Long Mountain – a film by Leslie Epperson July 8, 2020
  • A major win for endangered species in the Santa Ritas February 13, 2020

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Sign up to receive important updates straight to your inbox! We will guard your privacy and will not provide your email to anyone else.

RSS Latest from Rosemont Mine Truth

  • Pima County reaffirms resolution opposing Rosemont Mine April 19, 2019
  • Hudbay approves $122 million spending plan for “early works” at Rosemont March 29, 2019
  • Hudbay seeking Rosemont Mine joint venture partner after receiving key federal Clean Water Act permit March 15, 2019
  • Hudbay has failed to provide legal justification for Clean Water Act permit, Natural Resources Committee chairman says March 5, 2019

Selected Lens on the Land Photographs

PlayPause
Slider

Litigation Update

Speaking of which (the appeal originally filed in Nov. 2017 challenging the Forest Service’s approval of the mine), we now have a schedule for that case in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – not definitive, but at least a general time frame:

 

After a lot of negotiating, the lawyers have come to an agreement on the final schedule of our cases before the 9th Circuit Appeals Court. Here is the updated schedule:

  • Feds opening brief due by 1 June 2020
  • Hudbay opening brief due by 15 June 2020
  • Then, our response by 3 September 2020
  • Feds optional reply brief by 2 November 2020
  • Hudbay optional reply brief by 9 November 2020

Click here for more updates

DONATE

Copyright © 2021 · Save the Scenic Santa Ritas