Save the Scenic Santa Ritas

Fighting to protect the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains from the devastating impacts of mining.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Board of Directors and Staff
    • Endorsements
    • Opposition and Resolutions
    • Volunteers and Friends
  • Background
    • Rosemont Mine
      • History
      • Impacts
        • Air Quality
        • Land Use
        • Wildlife and Habitat
        • Scenic Views
        • Heritage
        • Recreation
        • Economy
        • Water and Hydrology
    • Legislation
    • Copper
    • Patagonia Area Mines
  • News
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Join Mailing List
    • Endorse Us
    • SSSR Presentation
    • Show Your Support
    • Letter Writing
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Visual Media
    • Links
    • Documents and Reports
    • 1872 Mining Law
    • Inspiration
  • Projects
    • Lens on the Land
      • Biodiversity
      • Culture
      • Economy: Industry, Tourism & Recreation
      • The Land
      • Night Sky and Astronomy
      • Water Resources
    • Rosemont Mine Truth

So is it a TREO study or a Rosemont Study that TREO is shilling?

August 4, 2011 By Administrator Leave a Comment


So is it a TREO study or a Rosemont Study that TREO is shilling?

Posted on July 24, 2011 on RosemontMineTruth.com

According to an article in Sunday’s Arizona Daily Star, we learn that Tucson Regional Economic Opportunity (TREO) is just one more tool in the shed for Rosemont Copper’s green washing efforts.

Something does not smell right about this apparently biased economic analysis.  On the first page of the consultant’s report, it says, “[t]his analysis is based on the best available information and is intended to aid Augusta Resource Corporation in demonstrating the impacts of the Rosemont Copper Project on Pima County.”

However, in the cover letter from TREO’s Joe Snell, he says, “[a]s you know, it is standard for us to prepare such reports for all projects that we work on.”

This is a wholly inadequate economic analysis that is at best incomplete;  at worst it is an attempt to willfully mislead this community about the economic impacts of this project.

As noted in today’s article, this study and the other Rosemont sponsored economic studies assume that the economic activity related to this yet-to-be permitted mine will take place in a vacuum, with no adverse impacts to other community sectors or tax revenues.

According to recently released Forest’s Service’s administrative draft the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for proposed Rosemont Mine, this project threatens both the quantity and quality of our water supplies, pollutes our air, destroys wildlife habitat and obliterates historical cultural sites.

When you put the relatively modest number of jobs that could be directly employed at the mine (about 400) into context with its impacts to the quality of life on which much of our economy depends, it is clear that the proposed Rosemont Mine is bad for southern Arizona’s economy.

This analysis also ignores TREO’s own findings that tourism creates $2 billion a year in revenue, far surpassing any annual economic contribution of the proposed Rosemont Copper project.   TREO also says that it has  “targeted business development activity on the following industries: Aerospace and Defense, Bioscience, Solar, and Transportation and Logistics.”

To encourage potential employers to relocate here, TREO says, “[t]he intriguing landscape of the desert gives way to majestic mountains in every direction, making Tucson a paradise for anyone who loves the outdoors. Hiking, biking, and exploring are favorite Tucson activities.” Obviously, the proposed Rosemont Mine would significantly impact these resources that make Tucson a great place to live and work.

The question that TREO and its members need to ask themselves is: Is the utter and complete destruction of a significant portion of a mountain range the kind of economic future TREO wants for our community?

It is these mountain ranges make Tucson and southern Arizona a great place to live and attract the clean knowledge-based industries that partner with our University and will move Arizona’s economy future into the 21st century.

Filed Under: Rosemont

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Litigation Schedule February 17, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2021 February 15, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2020 December 31, 2020
  • Long Mountain – a film by Leslie Epperson July 8, 2020
  • A major win for endangered species in the Santa Ritas February 13, 2020

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Sign up to receive important updates straight to your inbox! We will guard your privacy and will not provide your email to anyone else.

RSS Latest from Rosemont Mine Truth

  • Pima County reaffirms resolution opposing Rosemont Mine April 19, 2019
  • Hudbay approves $122 million spending plan for “early works” at Rosemont March 29, 2019
  • Hudbay seeking Rosemont Mine joint venture partner after receiving key federal Clean Water Act permit March 15, 2019
  • Hudbay has failed to provide legal justification for Clean Water Act permit, Natural Resources Committee chairman says March 5, 2019

Selected Lens on the Land Photographs

PlayPause
Slider

Litigation Update

Speaking of which (the appeal originally filed in Nov. 2017 challenging the Forest Service’s approval of the mine), we now have a schedule for that case in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – not definitive, but at least a general time frame:

 

After a lot of negotiating, the lawyers have come to an agreement on the final schedule of our cases before the 9th Circuit Appeals Court. Here is the updated schedule:

  • Feds opening brief due by 1 June 2020
  • Hudbay opening brief due by 15 June 2020
  • Then, our response by 3 September 2020
  • Feds optional reply brief by 2 November 2020
  • Hudbay optional reply brief by 9 November 2020

Click here for more updates

DONATE

Copyright © 2021 · Save the Scenic Santa Ritas