Save the Scenic Santa Ritas

Fighting to protect the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains from the devastating impacts of mining.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Board of Directors and Staff
    • Endorsements
    • Opposition and Resolutions
    • Volunteers and Friends
  • Background
    • Rosemont Mine
      • History
      • Impacts
        • Air Quality
        • Land Use
        • Wildlife and Habitat
        • Scenic Views
        • Heritage
        • Recreation
        • Economy
        • Water and Hydrology
    • Legislation
    • Copper
    • Patagonia Area Mines
  • News
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Join Mailing List
    • Endorse Us
    • SSSR Presentation
    • Show Your Support
    • Letter Writing
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Visual Media
    • Links
    • Documents and Reports
    • 1872 Mining Law
    • Inspiration
  • Projects
    • Lens on the Land
      • Biodiversity
      • Culture
      • Economy: Industry, Tourism & Recreation
      • The Land
      • Night Sky and Astronomy
      • Water Resources
    • Rosemont Mine Truth

Latest News: Augusta Resource’s Proposed Rosemont Mine In Trouble

February 22, 2012 By santaritas Leave a Comment

The EPA said in a letter this past week that deficiencies in critical Clean Water Act permit “could provide an adequate basis for permit denial”

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency this week warned that Augusta Resource Corporation’s proposed Rosemont Copper Mine may not obtain a key water quality permit needed to build the mine because of its potential impacts on “aquatic resources of national importance”.
The EPA letter, sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, stated that the deficiencies in Rosemont’s Clean Water Act Section 404 application “could provide an adequate basis for permit denial…”. The mine cannot be built without the 404 permit.

The EPA letter identified six critical deficiencies in Augusta Resource’s water quality permit:

  • An inadequate analysis of alternatives to ensure that the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative was chosen.
  • Questionable hydrological assessments.
  • No biological assessment (BA) to identify impacts on threatened or endangered species.
  • Significant degradation of Arizona’s rare and fragile wetland resources.
  • No plan to compensate for unavoidable impacts to waters of the United States.
  • Negative impact on recreation, aesthetics, and ecotourism, a $2.95 billion regional economy.

The letter can be downloaded here: http://www.scenicsantaritas.org/20120213_EPA.pdf

This week’s letter follows an early January letter from EPA, which also highlighted these significant water quality issues. Augusta Resource dismissed EPA’s initial concerns, claiming EPA has merely an “advisory” role in an apparent effort to cast the regulatory challenges facing this project in a more favorable light to potential investors.

“The EPA letter underscores the significant environmental and economic devastation, particularly to our water resources, that would occur in southern Arizona if this mine is allowed to proceed,” said Error! Contact not defined., President of Save the Scenic Santa Ritas, a Tucson-based citizen’s group opposed to the mine. “According to Augusta Resource’s PR spin, this mine would have already been operating for several years now. The EPA’s latest letter, however, makes its clear that the road ahead for the proposed Rosemont Mine is very tenuous at best.”

The Clean Water Act Sec. 404 permit is an essential regulatory approval and is separate from the Forest Service analysis of environmental impacts undertaken pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA.)

Filed Under: News, Water

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Litigation Schedule February 17, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2021 February 15, 2021
  • Links to recent news and letters – 2020 December 31, 2020
  • Long Mountain – a film by Leslie Epperson July 8, 2020
  • A major win for endangered species in the Santa Ritas February 13, 2020

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Sign up to receive important updates straight to your inbox! We will guard your privacy and will not provide your email to anyone else.

RSS Latest from Rosemont Mine Truth

  • Pima County reaffirms resolution opposing Rosemont Mine April 19, 2019
  • Hudbay approves $122 million spending plan for “early works” at Rosemont March 29, 2019
  • Hudbay seeking Rosemont Mine joint venture partner after receiving key federal Clean Water Act permit March 15, 2019
  • Hudbay has failed to provide legal justification for Clean Water Act permit, Natural Resources Committee chairman says March 5, 2019

Selected Lens on the Land Photographs

PlayPause
Slider

Litigation Update

Speaking of which (the appeal originally filed in Nov. 2017 challenging the Forest Service’s approval of the mine), we now have a schedule for that case in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – not definitive, but at least a general time frame:

 

After a lot of negotiating, the lawyers have come to an agreement on the final schedule of our cases before the 9th Circuit Appeals Court. Here is the updated schedule:

  • Feds opening brief due by 1 June 2020
  • Hudbay opening brief due by 15 June 2020
  • Then, our response by 3 September 2020
  • Feds optional reply brief by 2 November 2020
  • Hudbay optional reply brief by 9 November 2020

Click here for more updates

DONATE

Copyright © 2021 · Save the Scenic Santa Ritas